The Federal Reserve delivered a significant regulatory development Thursday that could reshape big bank’s supervision and unlock substantial merger activity across America’s largest financial institutions. The central bank’s proposal to revise its Large Financial Institution (LFI) supervisory rating framework represents the most substantial change to bank oversight since the 2018 framework was first introduced.
The announcement at 2:15 p.m. EDT came as Fed officials acknowledged a troubling disconnect between supervisory ratings and actual bank health. Currently, two-thirds of major banks holding 85% of Fed-supervised assets—approximately $26 trillion of $30.5 trillion total—receive ratings that restrict their growth despite maintaining strong capital and liquidity positions.
The Rating System Disconnect Driving Reform
Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman characterized the current situation as fundamentally flawed , any single “Deficient-1” rating across the three evaluation categories—capital planning, liquidity management, or governance and controls—automatically disqualifies an institution from “well-managed” status.
This rigid approach has created what banking industry experts describe as an “ascetic principle” where banks excelling in capital and liquidity can face severe operational restrictions due to governance assessments that supervisors themselves acknowledge are largely subjective.
The Bank Policy Institute welcomed the reform, stating it “never made sense to measure a bank’s overall health based solely on the lowest-performing criteria”. BPI President Greg Baer noted the system has led to two-thirds of large institutions receiving unsatisfactory ratings despite strength in other categories.
Immediate Impact on Bank Operations and Mergers
The proposed changes would allow institutions with up to one “Deficient-1” rating to maintain “well-managed” status, provided they avoid multiple deficiencies or any “Deficient-2” ratings. Fed officials estimate eight firms would immediately qualify for improved ratings, expanding from 13 to 21 institutions with “well-managed” designation.
For banking executives and compliance teams, this regulatory shift carries profound operational implications:
-
Enhanced Merger Activity: Banks achieving “well-managed” status gain access to expedited application processing and reduced constraints on acquisitions
-
Capital Market Access: Improved ratings typically correlate with better funding costs and expanded business opportunities
-
Operational Flexibility: Reduced regulatory restrictions on growth initiatives and strategic investments
Industry analysts project the changes could significantly boost bank merger activity, which has remained constrained by regulatory scrutiny and complex approval processes. Fitch Ratings previously identified supervisory ratings as a major obstacle to consolidation, particularly affecting institutions with over $50 billion in assets.
Sharp Divisions Among Fed Leadership
The proposal revealed stark philosophical differences within Fed leadership. Governor Michael Barr, the sole dissenting vote, issued a scathing statement warning the changes would “undermine supervision of the largest banks by effectively allowing firms that are not well managed to be treated as though they were”.
Barr specifically criticized allowing “badly managed firms to be labeled as well managed,” arguing this creates dangerous precedents for financial stability. His dissent highlighted concerns that weakened enforcement presumptions could reduce banks’ incentives to address serious operational problems.
Conversely, Bowman framed the proposal as essential for supervisory effectiveness, stating it represents “the first step in pursuing a broader goal, which is to ensure that supervisory activities, and the accompanying ratings, are aligned with a renewed supervisory focus on core, material financial risks”.
Industry Response and Broader Regulatory Context
The proposal arrives amid broader regulatory recalibration under the Fed’s new leadership structure. Since becoming Vice Chair for Supervision, Bowman has emphasized pragmatic approaches to bank oversight, focusing on material financial risks rather than procedural compliance.
Banking organizations have long criticized the subjective nature of governance assessments, arguing they lack the quantitative precision of capital and liquidity measurements. The American Bankers Association praised Bowman’s commitment to “regulatory tailoring” and ensuring capital requirements are “appropriately calibrated for banks of all sizes”.
However, regulatory reform advocates expressed concern about the timing and scope of changes. Former Fed Vice Chair Barr, speaking at Brookings Institution, warned policymakers to “resist the pressure” to loosen banking regulations during robust economic times, citing historical patterns where regulatory weakening preceded financial crises.
Timeline and Implementation Process
The Federal Reserve has opened a 30-day public comment period, with submissions due by August 14, 2025. The proposal passed by a 5-1 vote, with one abstention, requiring only four votes for final adoption.
Key implementation milestones include:
-
Public comment period: July 15 – August 14, 2025
-
Final rule anticipated: Q4 2025
-
Implementation: Expected early 2026
The Fed also indicated it will consider broader supervisory rating system reforms, including potential changes to the traditional CAMELS rating system used for smaller institutions.
What Banking Leaders Should Do Now
Immediate Actions for Bank Management:
Assessment and Strategic Planning: Banks should immediately evaluate their current LFI component ratings and develop roadmaps for achieving “well-managed” status under the revised criteria.
Board Engagement: Senior leadership must brief boards on potential business expansion opportunities and resource requirements for compliance improvements.
Merger Strategy Review: Institutions previously constrained by supervisory ratings should reassess strategic acquisition opportunities and partnership possibilities.
Regulatory Relationship Management: Banks should engage proactively with their Fed supervisory teams to understand how the changes will affect their specific situations and compliance timelines.
The Federal Reserve’s supervisory rating overhaul marks a pivotal moment for American banking regulation, potentially unleashing billions in merger activity while reflecting broader philosophical shifts toward risk-proportionate supervision. As the industry prepares for implementation, the changes signal a new era of regulatory pragmatism that could reshape competitive dynamics across the financial services landscape.
FAQ: Federal Reserve LFI Framework Changes
When will the new rating system take effect?
The Fed anticipates final implementation in early 2026, following the August 14, 2025 comment period closure.
How many banks will immediately benefit?
Fed officials estimate eight institutions would immediately qualify for improved “well-managed” status, expanding the total from 13 to 21 banks.
Does this affect smaller banks?
No, the LFI Framework only applies to institutions with over $100 billion in assets. Community and regional banks remain under the traditional CAMELS system.
What happens to current enforcement actions?
The proposal eliminates the presumption of enforcement action for single “Deficient-1” ratings, though banks must still address underlying supervisory findings.
How does this relate to bank merger approvals?
“Well-managed” status is crucial for merger approvals. The changes could significantly ease acquisition constraints for affected institutions.
Will there be additional rating system changes?
Yes, the Fed indicated it will evaluate broader reforms, including potential modifications to CAMELS ratings and composite rating additions to the LFI Framework.